Not-self, meditation, and awakening.
Monday, May 12th, 2008While I am not a qualified teacher, or even an experienced meditator, I do not agree that the Buddha’s position was that one cannot actively develop mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom. In fact, it seems to me that the Buddha did indeed encourage his followers to develop these things. To begin with, the Buddha taught that whatever is impermanent is stressful, and whatever is stressful is not-self. The goal of Buddhism is to essentially take this [analytical] knowledge, along with a specific set of practices, as a stepping stone to what I can only describe as a profound psychological event in the mind. Nevertheless, that does not mean that I believe the teachings on not-self are understood to deny individuality (MN 22) as well as individual effort (attakara), far from it. I believe that their intended purpose it to merely point out the ultimately unsatisfactory nature of the psycho-physical entity consisting of mind and matter in a variety of ways as well as the insubstantiality of our ego which is built upon these five, fleeting phenomena, not to suggest that mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom cannot be developed. Even though we have no real control over the unsatisfactory and impermanent nature of our existence, and this is evident by the fact that we cannot say, “Let my body be thus, Let my body not be thus. Let my feelings … perceptions … mental processes … consciousness be thus. Let my my feelings … perceptions … mental processes … consciousness not be thus” (SN 22.59), if you try to move your arm, your arm still moves. In other words, do not let the teachings on not-self lead to inaction but to right action.
The way I see it, craving is the cause of suffering, and to end suffering its cause must be removed; the difficulty arises when it comes to how exactly this is done. My theory is that craving is a very subtle aspect of the mind, or better put, that craving is a very subtle but powerful aspect of our psychology. It is there, latent in the mind, waiting to exert its influence through mental fabrications by directing or at the very least encouraging the mind to desire sensory experiences, to desire becoming, or to desire non-becoming, i.e., it is the “appetite” of the mind to feed upon sensory experiences via the five clinging-aggregates, the desire to desire. The problem is that these processes of subtle movement in the mind are so subtle that they are almost impossible to discern as they are taking place. That is where I believe meditation comes in; meditation helps to calm and still the mind so that these mental events become easier and easier to observe. One, in effect, uses conditionality in order to fabricate controlled states of mental absorption until they are able to discern the presence of craving, its movement in the mind, and the fact that even these refined and subtle states of mental absorption are ultimately stressful and unsatisfactory. This leads one to develop dispassion, and dispassion leads one to cease fabrication thus opening the doors to the deathless by ending the chain of causation. Therefore, my suggestion would be to stick with whatever method of meditation you find to be more conducive to attaining states of mental absorption and supplement that with a moderate amount of study to strengthen right view.
